There are a lot of complaints in regards to feral being overpowered about wow gold. How do you feel about these thoughts, as well as feral being considered similar to ret for Paladins? Well, I feel the claim has some validity to it. Feral druids, depending on their spec, do not have to worry about going boom about wow gold.

Although I really have not played much of moonkin, I have played against many and I have talked to good druids about the spec and how they feel about it. A Moonkin is a great third with either a warlock or MS class because they still do great damage. Their dots tick for good amounts, and wrath/starfire is no joke about wow gold. They can also cc on demand, especially when a player is at half HP. Many moonkins will be able to finish an opponent in a second or two after cyclone drops in combination with another teammate to get wow gold.

This was a big problem for them before, but I still think they suffer from not being able to play support well like Moonkins. Moonkins and paladins can use their support on the go, where as ferals still have to waste a couple globals to achieve this. It is either that or they can switch targets, and use a few globals to get combo pints/main or charge/bash. To add to before, both ret paladins and druids do great burst damage too, which is a very big reason why people associate the two. Many people feel Balance is becoming a primary spec of Druids, what are your thoughts on this?

Moonkins can also play support better than feral. If a feral druid needs to abolish poison or cleanse hex for example, they will need to spend a global to use that spell, and then another global on top of that to shift back into form. However, if they are being focused this is not always possible, and the same holds for cc to get wow gold.